🇬🇧 England · HEAD-TO-HEAD
Nottingham Forest Chelsea — H2H Analysis
For nottingham forest chelsea, I want the previous meetings to answer a practical question: does the old scoring pattern still fit the teams playing now? Compare the dated H2H sample with each club’s current-season attack, defensive allowance and home-away split below. The historical numbers explain the matchup; a dated preview supplies a selection only when that fixture has actually been analysed.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: What the recorded meetings show
Across 4 recorded official meetings, Nottingham Forest won 1, Chelsea won 2, with 1 draws. The dates run from 2024-10-06 to 2026-05-04. This is the collected window, not an all-time head-to-head record.
The mean total is 2.50 goals. Over 2.5 occurred in 2 of 4, under 2.5 in 2 of 4, and both teams scored in 2 of 4. Historical frequencies are separate from prediction results.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Published match previews and predictions
No dated preview has been published for this pairing yet. The statistical comparison below is available now; no future fixture or final selection is implied.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Recorded official head-to-head meetings
League records cover the available 2024/25, 2025/26 and 2026/27 files. Older individually verified official meetings are labelled as archived; cup coverage is partial.
| Date / season | Fixture | FT / HT | Corners | Shots on target | Yellow cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-042025/26 | Chelsea vs Nott'm Forest | 1–3HT 0–2 | 10–1 | 5–4 | 3–1 |
| 2025-10-182025/26 | Nott'm Forest vs Chelsea | 0–3HT 0–0 | 5–2 | 2–6 | 2–2 |
| 2025-05-252024/25 | Nott'm Forest vs Chelsea | 0–1HT 0–0 | 7–4 | 2–2 | 2–2 |
| 2024-10-062024/25 | Chelsea vs Nott'm Forest | 1–1HT 0–0 | 11–3 | 8–9 | 6–2 |
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Head-to-head averages by season
| Season | Meetings | Goals | First-half goals | Second-half goals | Corners | Shots on target | Cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/26 | 2 | 3.50n=2 | 1.00n=2 | 2.50n=2 | 9.00n=2 | 8.50n=2 | 4.00n=2 |
| 2024/25 | 2 | 1.50n=2 | 0.00n=2 | 1.50n=2 | 12.50n=2 | 10.50n=2 | 6.00n=2 |
Each value is the whole-match total per recorded meeting. Missing values remain missing. English and Scottish card records follow the provider’s second-yellow convention; total shots are not converted into shots off target.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Current season: Nottingham Forest and Chelsea
2026/27 league samples: Nottingham Forest, 7 matches (2026-08-22–2026-10-18); Chelsea, 7 (2026-08-24–2026-10-17). Each club is compared in its own current division; a change of division is not concealed.
Chelsea have the higher scoring rate in these samples: 2.43 goals per game, compared with 0.71. That describes output against different opponents; it is not a direct expected score for their next meeting.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Goals and scoring by half
Read the scored and conceded rates together, then check how much of the total arrives in each half.
Nottingham Forest: 7 matches · Chelsea: 7 matches. Same scale for both teams; recorded samples, not probabilities.
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 3 / 7 · Under 1.5: 4 / 7 (57%)
Over: 7 / 7 · Under 1.5: 0 / 7 (0%)
Over: 3 / 4 · Under 1.5: 1 / 4 (25%)
Over: 3 / 7 · Under 2.5: 4 / 7 (57%)
Over: 6 / 7 · Under 2.5: 1 / 7 (14%)
Over: 2 / 4 · Under 2.5: 2 / 4 (50%)
Over: 2 / 7 · Under 3.5: 5 / 7 (71%)
Over: 4 / 7 · Under 3.5: 3 / 7 (43%)
Over: 1 / 4 · Under 3.5: 3 / 4 (75%)
| Team | Produced / game | Allowed / game | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest | 0.71 | 1.29 | 7 |
| Chelsea | 2.43 | 1.86 | 7 |
First half and second half
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 2 / 7 · Under 0.5: 5 / 7 (71%)
Over: 5 / 7 · Under 0.5: 2 / 7 (29%)
Over: 1 / 4 · Under 0.5: 3 / 4 (75%)
Over: 1 / 7 · Under 1.5: 6 / 7 (86%)
Over: 5 / 7 · Under 1.5: 2 / 7 (29%)
Over: 1 / 4 · Under 1.5: 3 / 4 (75%)
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 6 / 7 · Under 0.5: 1 / 7 (14%)
Over: 7 / 7 · Under 0.5: 0 / 7 (0%)
Over: 4 / 4 · Under 0.5: 0 / 4 (0%)
Over: 2 / 7 · Under 1.5: 5 / 7 (71%)
Over: 5 / 7 · Under 1.5: 2 / 7 (29%)
Over: 3 / 4 · Under 1.5: 1 / 4 (25%)
| Team / period | Scored / game | Conceded / game | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest · First half | 0.29 | 0.29 | 7 |
| Nottingham Forest · Second half | 0.43 | 1.00 | 7 |
| Chelsea · First half | 1.29 | 0.71 | 7 |
| Chelsea · Second half | 1.14 | 1.14 | 7 |
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Corners: pressure for and against
Compare corners won with corners allowed. The two sides share one scale, while their samples retain separate match counts.
Nottingham Forest: 7 matches · Chelsea: 7 matches. Same scale for both teams; recorded samples, not probabilities.
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 3 / 7 · Under 9.5: 4 / 7 (57%)
Over: 5 / 7 · Under 9.5: 2 / 7 (29%)
Over: 3 / 4 · Under 9.5: 1 / 4 (25%)
| Team | Produced / game | Allowed / game | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest | 4.71 | 4.86 | 7 |
| Chelsea | 5.86 | 5.43 | 7 |
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Shots on target: attack and allowance
Accurate attempts describe direct goal threat. Opponent allowances help distinguish output from resistance.
Nottingham Forest: 7 matches · Chelsea: 7 matches. Same scale for both teams; recorded samples, not probabilities.
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 2 / 7 · Under 8.5: 5 / 7 (71%)
Over: 6 / 7 · Under 8.5: 1 / 7 (14%)
Over: 2 / 4 · Under 8.5: 2 / 4 (50%)
| Team | Produced / game | Allowed / game | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest | 3.57 | 3.29 | 7 |
| Chelsea | 5.57 | 5.86 | 7 |
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Yellow cards: each team and its opponents
Cards received and opposition cards are distinct observations. No referee appointment or card mean is inferred for an unannounced match.
Nottingham Forest: 7 matches · Chelsea: 7 matches. Same scale for both teams; recorded samples, not probabilities.
Team rows use each club’s current league games against all opponents. H2H uses only the recorded meetings between these two clubs. Historical rates are not prediction win rates.
Over: 4 / 7 · Under 3.5: 3 / 7 (43%)
Over: 6 / 7 · Under 3.5: 1 / 7 (14%)
Over: 4 / 4 · Under 3.5: 0 / 4 (0%)
| Team | Produced / game | Allowed / game | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest | 2.29 | 1.71 | 7 |
| Chelsea | 1.86 | 3.00 | 7 |
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Home and away form, kept separate
The first club named on this page is not necessarily the home side in a future fixture. Both venue splits are available, so a reversed fixture does not inherit the wrong home-away comparison.
| Team / venue | Scored | Conceded | First-half total | Second-half total | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nottingham Forest · Home | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00n=4 | 0.75n=4 | 4 |
| Nottingham Forest · Away | 1.67 | 2.00 | 1.33n=3 | 2.33n=3 | 3 |
| Chelsea · Home | 3.67 | 2.00 | 3.00n=3 | 2.67n=3 | 3 |
| Chelsea · Away | 1.50 | 1.75 | 1.25n=4 | 2.00n=4 | 4 |
Reading nottingham forest chelsea through the evidence
Previous meetings describe this pairing, while the current league samples describe each club against its wider set of opponents. A historical scoring pattern becomes more useful when checked against the relevant home attack and visiting defensive allowance. The page keeps these two sources of evidence separate.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: Different seasons, venues and competitions
A change of division, venue or coaching context can alter the comparison. The tables identify seasons and recorded match counts, and do not treat an old cup meeting as current league form. Reverse fixture order and spelling variants belong to this same page; the listed first club is not automatically the home team in an upcoming fixture.
Nottingham Forest Chelsea: From head-to-head statistics to a match prediction
An evergreen pairing page does not invent a forthcoming fixture or a selected line. When a dated match analysis is published, it appears in the materials list with its own stable URL and chosen markets. The full article contains the specific forecast; this page supplies the historical and seasonal context.